The following is the transcript of a CNBC Exclusive interview with Christine Lagarde, President of the European Central Bank, conducted ahead of the ECB’s Forum on Central Banking 2021.
Should you choose to use anything, all references must be attributed to CNBC and Annette Weisbach.
———————————————————————————————————–
Annette Weisbach (AW): Thank you very much for talking to us President Lagarde. Let me first ask you about your first two years, because it’s almost two years that you are now at the helm of the institution.
What has been the most challenging moment in that time?
Christine Lagarde (CL): It has been very different from what I had expected in the first place. I wasn’t expecting a walk in the park, but I was expecting something more quiet than what we had. The first thing that really hit our radar screen was the COVID crisis, where one country after the other, lockdown stopped its activity, and where we had to respond extremely fast.
Then I had certain issues with some National Court that wanted to challenge the validity of what had been done. And I had initially planned on starting a strategy review, which had not taken place in the last 17 years at the Central Bank. We started it, we suspended it, we started again, and now we have completed that. So altogether, it’s been a very, very busy couple of years, with massive engagement to support the economic activity in spite of this terrible pandemic that came to hit all of us.
AW: And it doesn’t stop, because what we’re witnessing today is inflation picking up a lot faster than previously expected; supply chains being disrupted across the planet.
So what’s your assessment here? Do you think that we’re seeing inflation actually being stickier than when your last round of forecast was conducted?
CL: That we will see when we have the data and the numbers, because we are really data-dependent and we try to assess the situation based on figures, on data, on facts. We don’t like to operate on the basis of hearsay assumptions here, price increases there. What is true though, is that we have been revising many of our projections upward in the last three quarters. So things have picked up faster, and that is true for growth. That is true for inflation. And that is true for employment.
In a way, it’s all a package of good news, because it means that our economies are responding, jobs are being created again. The service activities, which were completely down for so long, are now coming back in full swing. So all that is good. But, of course, it induces frictions, and those bottlenecks or those supply chains that have been disrupted because of the pandemic, and reinitiating the machine is taking time. But in the main, all of that we hope will last when it comes to growth so that activity continues, we hope will last when it comes to jobs, so that employment continues and unemployment goes down.
For prices, we think that there will be a return to much more stability in the year to come because many of the causes of higher prices are temporary. When you look at what’s causing it, a lot of it has to do with energy prices. You look back a year ago, prices were rock bottom – they have of course moved up. This difference is explaining a lot of the inflation that people are unfortunately experiencing at the moment. The same goes for some VAT impact, where VAT was reduced in order to stimulate activity, particularly in Germany. Now VAT is back. So that’s another base effect, if you will, that explains the prices level that we’re seeing now.
AW: But it seems that for the first time in many, many years, the so-called slack in the euro area is actually reducing, meaning that wages are also on the rise because there are not enough people to fill the open positions. Is that something you are monitoring—you’re acknowledging as well?
CL: Oh yeah. We’re paying great and close attention to this issue of slack. There is still quite a lot of slack in terms of employment. We still have at least 1 million more people unemployed today than pre-pandemic. So, there is still a lot of ground to cover for employment to return to pre-pandemic levels. We hope it will happen and as we close that gap, clearly economic activity will continue to be stimulated and we will see movement on the inflation front.
AW: Is that also the reason why during the last press conference you didn’t want to say that what you’ve decided was tapering? In a way it is, because you’re reducing stimulus. What is tapering then?
CL: I said “The lady’s not for tapering”. The lady’s for calibrating, because this has been our policy. Our monetary policy is intended to procure favorable financing conditions. Why is that? Because we want to support the economic players, whether it’s households, whether it’s enterprises, large corporates, sovereigns, all of them need to have favorable financing conditions, to cross that bridge towards the post pandemic stage.
To make sure that there are favorable financing conditions, we look at the whole chain of financing. And we look at inflation outlook, and we determine how much monetary support is needed. That helps us calibrate the purchases that we believe are necessary, which is why we calibrated and decided to purchase moderately in the coming quarter.
AW: You said you’re planning on purchasing moderately. What does it mean in numbers? Does it mean 60, 70? Or is there more flexibility to it?
CL: There is flexibility to the pandemic emergency program. That is the one of the landmarks of the PEPP (Pandemic Emergency Purchase Program), because we want to adjust, we want to have the ability to really operate as close to variations as possible to make sure that financing conditions remain favorable. So it works both ways. If we see that fewer purchases will still procure those favorable financing conditions, we will purchase less. If we see that more is needed, we will add to the purchases.
AW: The Financial Times ran a story based on a call between German economists and your chief economist that soon after the projection horizon, inflation will hit 2%. And then they concluded from that, that a rate hike could be on the cards already by 2023.
So why is that wrong in your opinion? Because you have defended that conclusion.
CL: It is not at all our conclusion. Anybody is free to draw their own conclusions on the basis of hearsay, secondhand information, quick look at this or that. What I know for a fact – because I know my chief economist and my colleague and friend Philip Lane – is that he never would have said something like what was alleged to have been said.
Now, of course, he would say and I would say that if we continue having a good monetary policy in the future, at some stage we must hit the 2% mark, because that’s our job. Price stability is defined under our new strategy review by reference to the 2% inflation mark, which is identified over a period of time because we are not going to respond abruptly or trust one number. But of course, we believe that if our monetary policy is successful, we will indeed hit 2% inflation.
AW: Of course, but my understanding of your forward guidance always holds that it needs to be 2% over the whole projection horizon. And then only after that would he think about hiking rates, is that correct?
CL: No, it’s not over the whole projection horizon. What we say is that we want to see inflation at that 2% level – say, midway during the projection period, and lasting all the way to the end of our horizon. We also want to make sure that as we speak, when we look at the economic situation, the underlying factors give us sufficient confidence that we will reach that for the medium term.
AW: Let’s talk also about the economic outlook because we are seeing – at least for Germany, but also for other countries – downgrades to the economic outlook because of the bottlenecks, but also because of the higher net energy prices, which is clearly a drag on companies’ performance.
How concerned are you that you actually need to revise your growth outlook downward?
CL: Again, we work on the basis of facts, figures, numbers, and then we do the best job we can to project. At the moment we have been revising our projection upward rather than downward. The numbers we are seeing at the moment lead us to believe that we are still in line with our with our projection. We will have new projections in December. We’ll see at that time, but for the moment we are on sync, and in line with our projection.
AW: Coming back to inflation and energy prices, because what we are seeing with the gas prices currently happening is unprecedented. What is your assessment here? And do you think these kinds of imbalances in certain markets will be something which we will witness more often?
CL: We are coming from a situation which was unprecedented, where everything stopped. And we are in this phase where everything is being reset, if you will. It’s inevitable that in those circumstances, there are bottlenecks, there are shortages of supply relative to much higher demand. So there is an adjustment period that is taking place at the moment.
Typically, what we’ve seen in previous circumstances, previous crises, previous supply shortages/bottlenecks is that it is resolved over the course of time. When you cannot get your spare parts from a particular source, you try to identify another source. Remember some of those very serious damages to supply chains. For instance, when there were tsunamis or very dramatic incidents in Japan in particular, everybody thought that it would be damaged and disrupted for the next 12 months. Well, in a matter of three months, the supplies were identified so new supply chains were put in place.
Things will fall into place – new sources of supply will be identified. Energy is going to be a matter that will probably stay with us longer because we are transitioning from fossil-industry-driven sources of energy to what we aspire to be much less fossil sources. So that’s the transition that is in play.
AW: I remember, I think I’ve asked you once, whether you think the transition into a CO2-free world will have deflationary or rather inflationary aspects and that at the time you said it’s not clear yet. Is it clearer now?
CL: My fear is that it’s not much more clear today. We are beginning to see some studies and academics are looking into it. And I think the jury’s still out. My hunch for having read some of those is that it’s likely to be pushing prices up for a short period of time, and probably later on might have some deflationary impact, but it’s very, very premature and early days to say.
AW: Yesterday, the Fed had an all-important meeting and it’s clear that they are now on the trajectory of exiting their extraordinary measures. How much of a time lag do you think there is between the ECB and the Fed?
CL: I have no idea. I have no idea because we are operating with different programs. I mean, there is an element of tapering in the way they have structured their support package to the economy, whereas we are not in that situation. We are in the process of calibrating and we have begun calibrating for October, November, December, based on the latest decision that we made, but it’s calibrating. It’s making sure that we are procuring those favorable financing conditions and purchasing what is needed in order to provide that. The Fed is doing something slightly different. And I don’t know whether they’re doing it. My colleague and friend Mr. Powell just said that November might be the time, but it’s fact-dependent again.
AW: He also was saying he thinks that the Evergrande market turbulence is purely a Chinese problem. Do you think that as well? Because it has clearly a spillover effect on the debt markets: for now it’s only Chinese, but the markets are very global.
CL: We are looking at it, we are monitoring. I had a briefing earlier on today because I think that all financial markets are interconnected. I have very vivid memories of latest stock market developments in China that had a bearing across the world, but in Europe and in the euro area in particular, direct exposure would be limited.
AW: But are you concerned that the investors’ sort of panic mode can easily spill over to other parts of the world as well? Are you concerned that something like that could happen if the Chinese state really let them fall?
CL: As I told you, for the moment what we are seeing is China-centric impact and exposure. I can’t speak for the United States, but I can say for Europe that its direct exposure is limited.
AW: We have a very important election coming up on Sunday. I know you don’t really like to talk about German politics, but just in terms of political risk. I frame it a bit wider as a question: We also have the French elections next year, and then after that, the Italian elections. Are you concerned that political risk might be back in Europe especially because a leader of 16 years is going to leave?
CL: I will take this opportunity to salute the 16 years that are being completed and pay tribute to Chancellor Merkel, who has done so much on the international scene in particular, representing Germany.
Any uncertainty is always propitious to movements and anticipation and fear. So, I would say that once the election is over and you have more certainty about the outcome – pending coalition discussion – then it’s a better situation than before, because then you have the uncertainty. Who is it going to be? What kind of coalition will it be? Which President will be elected in France? I think that once the election is over, then everybody knows what to expect and prepares for that. So it reduces uncertainty actually.
AW: Perhaps terminating the interview with a look back to a common experience with Angela Merkel, as you were saluting her for 16 years and her role as an international diplomat. If you look back, what kind of memories do you have and what’s the most important meeting or memory you have from working together with her?
CL: Dozens of G7, G20s. But I think the one that I will cherish is this time when the two of us went to the concert hall together – just very privately, she had one security officer, I had one. We went together in the same car and people were so respectful and discreet about her in Berlin, going to the concert. That was a lovely moment. And it was Daniel Barenboim conducting. So what else can you wish?
AW: I bet it was a great evening.
CL: Yes, and we had a lovely dinner after that.
AW: That’s good. Thank you very much for talking to us today.
-END-
For more information contact:
Nick Bailey
Communications Associate, International
About CNBC:
CNBC, First in Business Worldwide, is the world’s leading business and financial news channel. Its mission is to help the influential and aspirational make astute decisions to get ahead by providing live market updates, breaking news, in-depth analysis and exclusive interviews across its TV and digital platforms from Monday to Friday. During evenings and weekends the channel shows the best in sport, current affairs and entertainment.
With headquarters in New Jersey, London, Singapore, and Abu Dhabi CNBC provides a truly global 24-hour business briefing for senior business leaders, the financial community and those with assets to invest or protect.
A growing portfolio of digital products, such as the Beyond the Valley and Squawk Box Europe express podcasts as well as the CNBC Flash Briefing for Amazon Alexa, help busy audiences to Get Ahead and Stay Ahead no matter where they are.
Today the channel is available in more than 392 million homes worldwide. Visit
